Botched kidnapping morph into Benghazi slaughter?
JERUSALEM – A key segment of a Benghazi whistleblower’s account of the deadly Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. facility may warrant further review after an al-Qaida member’s claim that Ambassador Christopher Stevens was killed in a botched kidnap attempt.
Abdallah Dhu-al-Bajadin, who was identified by U.S. officials speaking to the Washington Free Beacon as a known weapons experts for al-Qaida, wrote on a jihadi website that Stevens was killed by lethal injection after plans to kidnap him during the Benghazi assault went awry.
A detail provided in testimony by Gregory Hicks, former deputy chief of the U.S. mission in Libya, may require further investigation in light on the claim.
Hicks said the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, Libya, was told Stevens was taken to a hospital controlled by Ansar Al-Sharia, the group originally believed to have been behind the Benghazi attack.
Stated Hicks: “We began to hear also that the ambassador has been taken to a hospital. We don’t know initially which hospital it is, but we – through David’s reports we learned that it is in a hospital which is controlled by Ansar Sharia, the group that Twitter feeds had identified as leading the attack on the consulate.”
Leaked Memo: Confiscate All Guns!
Tuesday, June 4, 2013 9:13
The National Rifle Association has obtained a Department of Justice memo calling for national gun registration and confiscation. The nine page “cursory summary” on current gun control initiatives was not officially released by the Obama administration.
The DOJ memo (downloadable here as a PDF) states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.
House votes to delay bulk ammunition purchase by DHS
By Pete Kasperowicz – 06/05/13 11:01 PM ET
The House late Wednesday voted to stop the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from entering into new contracts to buy millions of rounds of ammunition until the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reports to Congress on the need for the ammo, and its cost.
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) proposed an amendment to the DHS spending bill for 2014 that would require the report to Congress before it can pursue plans to buy 1.1 billion rounds of ammunition. Meadows said the speed bump is a necessary reaction to news of the huge purchase, which alarmed many Americans and prompted conservative groups to suspect that the government was stocking up on the rounds to fight citizens.
“Given this large purchase, the American people and members of Congress rightfully had concerns and questions,” Meadows said. “This is a responsible amendment which ensures that Congress and the American people are aware of the necessity and the cost of ammunition prior
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/303803-house-votes-to-delay-bulk-ammo-purchase-by-dhs#ixzz2VXDdjgoW
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
NSA taps in to user data of Google, Skype and others, secret files reveal
• Top secret PRISM program claims direct access to servers of firms including Google, Facebook and Apple
• Companies deny any knowledge of program in operation since 2007
The NSA access is part of a previously undisclosed program called PRISM, which allows officials to collect material including search history, the content of emails, file transfers and live chats, the document says.
The Guardian has verified the authenticity of the document, a 41-slide PowerPoint presentation – classified as top secret with no distribution to foreign allies – which was apparently used to train intelligence operatives on the capabilities of the program. The document claims “collection directly from the servers” of major US service providers.
Although the presentation claims the program is run with the assistance of the companies, all those who responded to a Guardian request for comment on Thursday denied knowledge of any such program.
In a statement, Google said: “Google cares deeply about the security of our users’ data. We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we review all such requests carefully. From time to time, people allege that we have created a government ‘back door’ into our systems, but Google does not have a back door for the government to access private user data.”
Several senior tech executives insisted that they had no knowledge of PRISM or of any similar scheme. They said they would never have been involved in such a program. “If they are doing this, they are doing it without our knowledge,” one said.
An Apple spokesman said it had “never heard” of PRISM.
The NSA access was enabled by changes to US surveillance law introduced under President Bush and renewed under Obama in December 2012.
The program facilitates extensive, in-depth surveillance on live communications and stored information. The law allows for the targeting of any customers of participating firms who live outside the US, or those Americans whose communications include people outside the US.
It also opens the possibility of communications made entirely within the US being collected without warrants.
Disclosure of the PRISM program follows a leak to the Guardian on Wednesday of a top-secret court order compelling telecoms provider Verizon to turn over the telephone records of millions of US customers.
The participation of the internet companies in PRISM will add to the debate, ignited by the Verizon revelation, about the scale of surveillance by the intelligence services. Unlike the collection of those call records, this surveillance can include the content of communications and not just the metadata.
Some of the world’s largest internet brands are claimed to be part of the information-sharing program since its introduction in 2007. Microsoft – which is currently running an advertising campaign with the slogan “Your privacy is our priority” – was the first, with collection beginning in December 2007.
It was followed by Yahoo in 2008; Google, Facebook and PalTalk in 2009; YouTube in 2010; Skype and AOL in 2011; and finally Apple, which joined the program in 2012. The program is continuing to expand, with other providers due to come online.
Collectively, the companies cover the vast majority of online email, search, video and communications networks.
[Taking away rights in the name of fighting terrorism.]
Former CIA director helping to bolster same surveillance system that brought him down
Paul Joseph Watson
June 7, 2013
Former CIA Director David Petraeus is in attendance at the 2013 Bilderberg Group conference to help construct the “big data” spy grid, which is set to become the new frontier of clandestine statecraft as Internet connectivity becomes ubiquitous.
Bilderberg’s official agenda for 2013 lists one of the areas of discussion as, “How big data is changing almost everything,” a reference to how the “Internet of things” along with the ubiquitous growth of social media is transforming the world of surveillance and the ability to foresee and manipulate future events.
At almost the exact same time, a Homeland Security subcommittee in the United States will also be discussing “big data” and its implications in the context of social media.
Bilderberg’s effort to push the “big data” agenda ties in with the secretive organization’s close relationship with Google, which as we documentedis now merging with and taking over from Bilderberg in many aspects.
The discussion about “big data” is also likely to cover how social media can be used to launch more faux revolutions and social movements as it was in Egypt, which was aided in no small part by Google.
As we have documented, the Internet of things is the process of manufacturing every new product with a system that broadcasts wirelessly via the world wide web, allowing industry and the government to spy ubiquitously on every aspect of your existence.
- A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Petraeus has previously hailed the “Internet of things” as a transformational boon for “clandestine tradecraft”. In other words, it will soon be easier than ever before to keep tabs on the population since everything they use will be connected to the web, with total disregard for privacy considerations. The spooks won’t have to plant a bug in your home or your vehicle, you will be doing it for them.
It’s ironic that Petraeus is helping bolster the very same surveillance system that brought him down last year when details emerged of his extra-marital affair.
[Call me a wacko if it makes you feel good, but after you do that, take the time to examine the evidence. –Ed.]
Obama Long-Form Birth Certificate, Facts, Myths, Questions and common misunderstandings.
1) The document that Obama released is his “original” long-form birth certificate.
FALSE, it is supposed to be an alleged “COPY” as indicated in the stamp text on the lower right quadrant of the document that reads, “this is a true copy or abstract.” Look up the definition of what “abstract” means.
2) Obama refused to release this or similar document for years,
a. despite over 50 lawsuits demanding it, and
b. a decorated Lt. Col. Terrance Latkin went to prison because of he questioned Obama’s eligibility to command but Obama refused then to provide it.
TRUE & TRUE. One must question the motives of a supposed President to withhold information regarding his eligibility for office for over 3 years.
3) Only shortly before the release of Obama’s document the
a. Former Hawaiian records clerk said to CNN that she had seen it, yet
b. The Governor of Hawaii, Neal Abercrombie (and friend of Obama’s family in Hawaii), stated that he had his people look for Obama’s long-form and they could NOT find it!
i. LINK TO NY DAILY NEWS ARTICLE: http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-01-27/news/27738132_1_barack-obama-president-obama-birth-certificate
ii. LINK TO UK NEWSPAPER http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html
iii. LINK TO AUDIO OF WITNESS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvrb7YqdvxE
c. The former Elections official made a formal affidavit stating he looked for the Obama birth records and could NOT find anything, and that his superiors told them they did not exist.
i. LINK TO ARTICLE http://www.eutimes.net/2011/01/hawaii-official-now-swears-no-obama-birth-certificate/
ii. LINK TO VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nKVpD5v4Hk
TRUE, so it is even more suspicious that suddenly it then appears. So who was lying?
4) It says “Certificate of Live Birth” and not “Birth Certificate.”
TRUE, this is normal, it is what was used on the correct documents of the time period, see the comparative Nordyke Twin BCs for a day after Obama’s alleged birth date.
5) There is a page curl on the left side of the document.
TRUE, this appears on other BC “copies” from near that time period and is likely because the BCs were probably put in to a bound book in the archives. I do not consider that fact suspicious. However the shape of the curl does differ much from comparable BCs.
6) The lines in the background do not follow the curve of the left side of the document.
TRUE, However I don’t see this as a sole reason to call the document a fake, as I’d expect it to that as was supposed to be a scan that on would assume was printed on security paper. But wait, there is more…
7) The layers of the “.pdf” file of Obama’s document could be caused by scanning,
FALSE. While in some rare cases, depending on the scanning software, layering is possible. However even the layperson looking can zoom in on the image and see that the back ground changes under the main part, the large area of the “alleged” certificate. It is easy to see that it becomes more blurred and grayer, and this clearly indicates that this document was NOT scanned and simply printed on the security paper, but IT IS in fact a layered image made on a computer. There’s more to it, but this info clears up the scanned layering argument. See image further below.
8) In one of the many layers of Obama’s document there is what looks like something was “Whited-Out”.
TRUE, another reason why the document is suspicious.
9) The lines of type near the curved edge do not seem to follow the curve.
TRUE. This seems to show that the lines of type or at least the first words appear likely to have been layered in by computer. See images further below.
10) The “M” in the time field appears to be of a different font and it’s darker.
TRUE. However, it appears to be preprinted on the other comparable BCs of that time period, but on Obama’s it does appear to be out of location. See images further below.
11) Out of alignment letters in the typing.
TRUE, but such can be common with old typewriters. This is not alone an indication of a forgery. However, this seems more pronounced in the Obama document than other BC’s, and a forger may “overdo” use such a thing to try to make a more believable look of a typed document. See images further below.
12) The lines do not all line up on the left margin like on those of the Nordyke Twins BCs and other BCs.
TRUE. This alone does not make the document a fake, but is does raise some questions. Look at the documents below, the age fields of the parents are not in line with the margin as in the other real BC for Nordyke from the next day in 1961. See images further below.
13) The “X”s in the boxes do NOT line up with the rest of the text.
TRUE, www.ObamaNotQualified.com was the first to bring it up, see images below,
This occurs too often to be a typing error and likely those were filled in later. See image below.
14) The alleged birth hospital’s site mentions that it wasn’t called that back then, according to their website.
TRUE, however, the Nordyke Twins BCs, seen just above, list the same name, so it’s highly likely that the name of the birth hospital is NOT an issue.
15) The City listed says Honolulu, Oahu, and Not Honolulu, Hawaii.
TRUE. However, this would be a common error and is not reason alone for suspicion. In fact if you look at the Nordyke Twins BCs, each has it listed differently! See image above.
16) There are no baby footprints seen on the alleged birth certificates.
TRUE, some states do not or did not do that, according to comparables. Again it seems that this was not the practice then in Hawaii. The KENYAN BC that surfaced and is alleged to be Obama’s does have a footprint on it. CLICK IMAGE OR HERE FOR IMAGE of Kenyan hospital generated long-form BC.
17) His father’s race is listed as “African” but it would have been Negro back then.
LIKELY: This is probably true, as more research is being conducted to obtain the long-form certificates to see if any others list “African” as a race back then. It is most unlikely as per the Hawaiian Government definitions of race for vital records in 1961 listed below.
“VITAL STATISTICS OF THE UNITED STATES 1961 – VOLUME I – NATALITY”
“Race and color”
“Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and “other nonwhite.” The category “white” includes, in addition to persons reported as “white,” those reported as Mexican or Puerto Rican. With one exception, a reported mixture of Negro with any other race is included in the Negro group; other mixed parentage is classified according to the race of the nonwhite parent and mixtures of nonwhite races to the race of the father. The exception refers to a mixture of Hawaiian and any other race, which is classified as Part-Hawaiian. In most tables a less detailed classification of “white” and “nonwhite” is used.”
above quote from =http://www.nber.org/vital-statistics/historical/nat61_1.CV.pdf
18) The age for Obama’s father listed on Obama’s alleged certificate is “25”, yet the age on recently released immigration documents would make him “27” at the time of Obama’s birth.
TRUE, There are extensive records released under the Freedom of information Act (FOIA), they can be viewed at. http://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File The age of Obama’s father being incorrect on the long form BC give more reason to question its authenticity, as it is the same age incorrectly published many places regarding Obama Jr.’s political career, yet we may be sure that Obama Senior’s wife would have known his age.
19) The record number on Obama’s is higher than that of both Nordyke Twins born the day after.
TRUE, this has been known since 2008 short form COLB, and it is still a good grounds to demand that the original document in Hawaii be made available for independent professional examination by various professionals as would occur with other Historical Documents. Paper Analysis, Printing ink Analysis, Writing ink Analysis, and Handwriting Analysis. Refer to images shown previously above.
20) The layers of the document reveal the last numeral “1” of the record number is of a different layer, different resolution and different pixel size.
TRUE, just zoom in on it or, better, an original of the day 1 release .pdf from 04/27/2011. Thousands of people downloaded it that day. You can view the layers using the Adobe Illustrator program. This was reported first on www.ObamaNotQualified.com, This difference appears to be proof of document tampering and/or forgery, and is further grounds to demand that the original document in Hawaii be made available for independent professional examination by various professionals as would occur with other Historical Documents. Paper Analysis, Printing ink Analysis, Writing ink Analysis, and Handwriting Analysis.
21) Similar handwriting on Obama’s and the Nordyke Twins.
TRUE. This is most odd and is further grounds to demand that the original document in Hawaii be made available for independent professional examination by various professionals as would occur with other Historical Documents. Paper Analysis, Printing ink Analysis, Writing ink Analysis, and Handwriting Analysis.
22) The registrar’s signatures, when compared to another BC, do not seem to even look close.
TRUE, This was first noticed by Jim of www.ObamaNotQualified.com and compared to the same name signature of another BC and results posted on that site.,
“I found another signature for the registrar, it’s from another person’s BC, and it’s from near the same time period, and upon comparison of the registrar’s signatures (see image above), even the layperson can see the 2 signatures have several substantial differences. Look at the shape and style of the first character of both as they are drastically different. Look at the size of the loops in the “L”s, the closed loops in the “e” ‘s and how in the lower signature (real) the signer’s style has an upward lift at the end of the “L”. Also note on the real signature (upper), the pen lift at the end of the signature is to the right, on the suspect signature (lower) it curves around to the left.”
So, it’s most odd and again is yet further grounds to demand that the original document in Hawaii be made available for independent professional examination by various professionals as would occur with other Historical Documents. Paper Analysis, Printing ink Analysis, Writing ink Analysis, and Handwriting Analysis.
23) “Stanley” in parenthesis is handwritten above Obama’s mother’s name.
TRUE. This doesn’t mean much, as her first name was really “Stanley,” which is typically a man’s name. She (if real) or a forgery (if faked) could have realized after the fact that they had to put in her real name. While not in itself indication of a forgery, it is a question as to the validity of the signature.
24) Snopes listed a different name for the doctor than that shown on the BC.
TRUE. However, that seems to have been scrubbed from Snopes.
25) There is NO indication at all of any embossed “seal”.
TRUE, this is most odd as even recent COLB short forms have such a seal. It is most unlikely that Hawaii would release such an important document without an embossed seal, especially considering it will become a Historical Document someday.
26) Obama mentions and it is PUBLISHED in Barrack Obama’s book “Dreams of my Father” on page 26, “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms.”
TRUE. So it is highly suspicious that Obama would not simply release that sooner when asked for it for at least 3 years, but instead he allegedly requests a recent “copy” dated April, 25th 2011! This is more reason to not trust the document that was produced.
27) The border seems to be MISSING from the Obama WH alleged long-form BC but is on other Hawaiian BCs of that time period..
TRUE. Not sure how that could be explained.
28) The commas “,” are different, and differently spaced..
TRUE. On Obama’s alleged BC, the comma after the date month, is fat and different, the comma after Wichita, is lower and too close to the “a”, and the comma after the 4 in birth date it spaced too far. Compare to other BCs this is inconsistent with known authentic BCs.
29) Time is the same on Obama WH alleged long-form BC as on the alleged Obama long-form KENYAN BC.
TRUE CLICK IMAGE OR HERE FOR IMAGE of Kenyan hospital generated long-form BC.
30) There are at least TWO (2) different pixel sizes on the document,
TRUE, This was another www.ObamaNotQualified.com discovery FIRST exclusive on 4/27/2011.
This can NOT happen on a basic scan and this is pure PROOF that the document was faked on a computer.
This is a zoom in from the original image obtained directly from the whitehouse.gov website! then saved as a .jpg and with red text added. The image is otherwise unaltered.
This difference in pixels and/or “aliasing” can also be noticed in the typewritten words, “R” in Barack, “K” in Kenya, “S” in Stanley. “Aliasing” can only be done on a computer.
THE ONLY WAY THERE WOULD BE DIFFERENT PIXEL SIZES IS IF THE DOCUMENT WAS CREATED IN A COMPUTER USING LAYERS. NO SUCH PROGRAMS WERE AVAILABLE TO DO THAT IN 1961. THIS IS THE MOST SUBSTANTIAL PROOF OF FORGERY. IT IS INDISPUTABLE.
31) There is evidence of different type on the document.
TRUE, look at the “ap” on “Kapiolani” the “ap” is “kerned.” Kerning is how letters are put closer together to save space.
Kerning reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerning & http://www.aclearvoice.org/archives/2004/09/killian_memos_a.php Older typewriters could only type in blocks because of the shape of the keys, so “kerning” was not possible on those, and in 1961 even the “state of the art” typewriters were ‘IBM Selectrics’ that used a swiveling ‘ball’ and not blocked keys that was just released in 1961. These were expensive then, and most small state government agencies did not get them for many years. Typical customers of those machines were high-level newspapers and printing companies. Reference IBM archive info for 1961 http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1961.html but kerning was not possible even on “state of the art” machines in 1961, so therefore it was not possible to have the “ap” so close together in 1961. I mention the IBM selectric because the ball type we very accurate so out of line characters were almost impossible, and even IF they could kern then (not possible), all that would prove is that the document was typed on 2 different typewritters of which would not make any sense and again make the document even more questionable. NO TYPEWRITER CAN KERN, because the typewriter can NOT know what letters are or will be next to the letter you are typing when you type it. A word processing machine can do that, because it makes adjustments to what you have typed previously as you go. Such was NOT available in 1961. Simply put, you can NOT have so many characters out of alignment and kerning on the same line or same words if it was typed on the same machine, and again kerning was NOT possible in 1961.
Kerning was also an issue regarding the famous faked documents in regard to President George W. Bush’s military record that was faked for CBS of which eventually several CBS staff were fired and famous reporter Dan Rather was forced to retire, so do not think for a second that the mainstream media does go along with forgeries that suit their agenda.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy Dan Rather later stated CBS fired him over it.
32) IF Obama really was born in Hawaii as his document states then he is eligible to be President of the United States.
FALSE. Obama’s document in fact supports that he is NOT eligible because it states his father’s birthplace as Kenya, and to be required for the Office of President by the US Constitution Article II, Section I, Paragraph 5, the person MUST be a “Natural born Citizen,” who must be born on US soil by parents who are BOTH US Citizens. If Obama’s father had became a US Citizen by naturalization before Obama’s birth, then Obama (if US born) may have been eligible. However, the US Government’s own immigration file on Obama Sr. shows that not only was Obama Sr. never a US Citizen or resident, but in fact it was recommended that he be deported. Obama Sr. left the US in 1964 and never returned to the USA.
Important video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ru2XxW6ywas
Artist Says Pentagon Censoring Christian Art
Wednesday, June 05, 2013
An artist whose painting was removed from an U.S. Air Force dining hall says the Pentagon is censoring Christian art.
Ron Dicianni’s painting is called “Blessed are the Peacemakers” and references the scripture Matthew 5:9. It was part of a collection to honor the heroes who responded to the 9-11 terrorist attacks.
The painting was removed from Idaho’s Mountain Home Air Force Base less than an hour after a complaint from Mikey Weinstein, the founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.
This is the same organization leader called religious proselytizing “a national security threat” in a private meeting with Pentagon officials last April.
The artist’s son, Grant DiCianni, told Fox News, “On its face, this seems like nothing short of a clear anti-Christian agenda.”
Grant DiCianni is also president of Tapestry Productions.
“It appears that the Air Force and the Pentagon have undertaken a dangerous war to rid the military of anything that points to Christ, and that needs to be brought to light,” he said.
The estimated population of the United States is 318,365,451
so each citizen’s share of this debt is $55,037.16.
The National Debt has continued to increase an average of
$2.37 billion per day since September 30, 2012!
Concerned? Then tell Congress and the White House!